Water For Elephants Review

Water for Elephants, "based on the bestselling book, was released in theaters on Friday. If you read a book, you'll be waiting. We always do. But I did not read it, and I went, not knowing about any story. I know that the features of the actors I admire, and it's always the "Water for Elephants" occurs in 1930. Christoph Waltz is sometimes nasty circus owner travels a second year. a new employee, Robert Pattinson, can not continue in its work caring for animals as it seems to take better care of the headliner and the wife of the owner, played by Reese Witherspoon.

Witherspoon just glowing in his role. She channels this bygone era very well, and you can feel her love and her pain, as the story plays out.

Pattinson continues to impress beyond the world of Twilight. In this film, it is gentle wounded soul, Hal Holbrook plays the role brilliantly in the years to nature.

And the waltz just knows how to assert that the internal evil. hook for me. There is a lot of drama in the "Water for Elephants." And I'll tell you the studio has not released the scene of violence against an elephant playing a very disturbing way, even if they were manufactured using high-tech special effects.

This film is sometimes sad, sometimes makes you cringe, and always makes you hope for a happy ending. I can not tell you or you do not get it, but I will say you probably tighten more than once observed.

Star attraction of "Water for Elephants" are actually working. In the moments when the story does not grab me, the performances did.